Saturday, January 9, 2010

Gun Control In America

FOX Network's Frank Luntz reported that the gun-control debate set out to survey gun owners and found that 69% of those polled agreed there should be no federal restrictions on trace data, as did 74% of gun owners as a whole.

When asked whether they supported or opposed a "proposal requiring all gun sellers at gun shows to conduct criminal background checks of the people buying guns," 69% of the NRA members and 85% of the nonmembers were in favor. This goes to the so-called gun-show loophole, which allows used-gun merchants to sell firearms without doing the background checks that are required when selling new guns. Attempts in Congress to close this loophole have died after meeting strong opposition from the NRA.UN maneuvers to create “Global Gun Control”
http://www.davegj13.wordpress.com/

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the Obama administration would reverse the Bush administration’s opposition to the UN’s proposed International Small Arms Treaty. This will clear the way for the treaty to reach a vote by the U.N. General Assembly. Seven countries, led by the British, are trying to restart U.N. efforts to restrict imports and exports of small arms. The goal is to “regulate the global arms trade” and “prevent the illegal transfer of guns.”

The irony of this effort is that since virtually banning guns in 1997, the UK has watched violent crime skyrocket by as much as 77% in some studies. The British Mail Online reports, “In the decade following [the election of the Labor Party] in 1997, the number of recorded violent attacks soared by 77 percent to 1.158 million – more than two every minute.” As a result the U.K. now has the highest violent crime rate in the European Union.

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the UN Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme. To the petty dictators and one-worlders who control the UN, the U.S. isn’t a “shining city on a hill” — it’s an affront to their grand totalitarian designs for the globe. These anti-gun globalists know that so long as Americans remain free to make our own decisions without being bossed around by big government bureaucrats, they’ll NEVER be able to seize the worldwide oppressive power they crave.

This is just another attempt to give the U.N. jurisdiction over U.S. policy. On the heels of Obama’s recent Executive Order to provide Interpol with diplomatic level immunity from U.S. law and Constitutional behavior this is another slap in the face to our sovereignty.

Restore the Republic, Reject Global Governance!
“…to disarm the people is the best and most effective way to enslave them…” – George Mason

“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press.” – Thomas Jefferson

Why Switzerland Has The Lowest Crime Rate In The World (lots of guns)
The country has a population of six million, but there are estimated to be at least two million publicly owned firearms, including about 600,000 automatic rifles and 500,000 pistols.

Instead of a standing, full-time army, the country requires every man to undergo some form of military training for a few days or weeks a year throughout most of their lives. Between the ages of 21 and 32 men serve as frontline troops. They are given an M-57 assault rifle and 24 rounds of ammunition, which they are required to keep at home. Once discharged, men serve in the Swiss equivalent of the US National Guard, but still have to train occasionally and are given bolt rifles. Women do not have to own firearms, but are encouraged to.

Obama revives talk of U.N. gun controlNRA guests warn international treaty would strip 2nd Amendment rights
WorldNetDaily’s Drew Zahn reported that the U.S. joined a nearly unanimous 153-1 U.N. vote to adopt a resolution setting out a timetable on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, including a U.N. conference to produce a final accord in 2012.

Brian Wood, disarmament expert for Amnesty International, explained in a Bloomberg report why his organization and others are pushing for the U.S. to join Arms Trade Treaty talks. Wood said the U.S. is the largest conventional arms trader in the world and the unregulated trade of conventional arms "can fuel instability, transnational organized crime and terrorism."

"All countries participate in the conventional arms trade and share responsibility for the 'collateral damage' it produces – widespread death, injuries and human rights abuses," said Rebecca Peters, director of the International Action Network on Small Arms in an Agence France-Presse interview. "Now finally governments have agreed to negotiate legally binding global controls on this deadly trade."

Bill forces citizens to list guns on taxes?Firearms tracking act gives authorities access to your 'mental health records'
WorldNetDaily’s Chelsea Schilling reported that a firearms tracking bill has many bloggers up in arms over a federal requirement that would purportedly force gun owners to list their firearms on federal income tax returns.

The Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act, or H.R. 45, was introduced Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Ill., on Jan. 6. While the bill does not include stipulations about reporting guns on tax forms, it does contain numerous gun-control proposals that are drawing fierce criticism from gun-rights advocates.

If enacted, the bill would forbid any person from owning any handgun or semiautomatic firearm that accepts a detachable ammunition-feeding device, not including antiques, without obtaining a license.

Under the legislation, a person who is seeking a firearm license must submit to the attorney general an application including the following information:
1) current passport-sized photo
2) name, address, date and birthplace
3) any other name the applicant has used
4) a clear thumbprint
5) a statement that the individual is not a person prohibited by federal or state law from obtaining a firearm
6) certification that the applicant will keep the firearm safely stored and out of the possession of minors
7) certificate showing applicant has passed a written firearms examination on the safe storage of firearms, safe handling of firearms, use of firearms in the home and risks associated with use, legal responsibilities of firearms owners and "any other subjects, as the Attorney General determines to be appropriate"
8) authorization to release "to the Attorney General or an authorized representative of the Attorney General any mental health records pertaining to the applicant"
9) the date on which the application was submitted
10) applicant signature
National Rifle Association spokeswoman Rachel Parsons told ESPN the bill focuses primarily on guns as instruments as crime instead of penalizing the people who commit criminal acts. She said, under the bill, law-abiding citizens might become violators of the law.

"Several provisions in this bill would make compliance nearly impossible," she said. "For instance, the bill spells out that if a firearms license holder fails to notify the Attorney General of an address change within 60 days, that person would be subject to a 5-year prison term and a fine of up to $250,000."

Cyndi’s Veiw:

The Bill of Rights
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

What about our 2nd Amendment rights? There seems to be no foundation on which the American people can stand if they take away our Constitional rights. And if you are watching, they are taking them in small increments at a time.

There is a push for a Global treaty that would take away the right to own a gun. The EU plans to use the United Nations as a launching point to carry out their agenda to bring gun control to the United States. This will make it harder for law abiding citizens to get guns if they want them.

We as Americans have a right to bear weapons for our own use. Not only for protection, but to hunt game. From the very beginning of time man has used weapons to servive. So what happens if laws are passed to disarm us? I will tell you one of the things that will happen. The criminals will still have guns and will get them at will. When guns are outlawed then only outlaws will have guns.

The other argument is that this treaty will be good for fighting International crime. But this is all bogus. There is gonna be a restriction of ownership of guns of all kinds. And the UN will work hard to close any loopholes.

Things are not what they seem. They have window dressed this Bill to look as though it is just another treaty that is for our good. But, I am here to tell you that they are about to slap your hands everytime you reach for your freedom rights.

We need too tell our politicians if they vote for this Bill they need not look for re-election. We want our elected officials to stand with us not against us.

2 comments:

  1. It is unclear as to whether the portion of this post above "Cindy's View" is your own interpretation of what's going on, or is a quote from some other source.

    If it is your interpretation, I would take issue with this statement:

    This goes to the so-called gun-show loophole, which allows used-gun merchants to sell firearms without doing the background checks that are required when selling new guns.

    Although that's how the anti-gunners and media continue to portray the issue, that is a misleading characterization. Considering your stated view on these issues, I'd imagine that you already know this, but for the benefit of any less informed readers that may happen upon this post, the following is respectfully submitted:



    "mer⋅chant [mur-chuhnt]
    –noun
    1. a person who buys and sells commodities for profit; dealer; trader.
    2. a storekeeper; retailer: a local merchant who owns a store on Main Street.
    3. Chiefly British. a wholesaler."

    merchant. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved January 11, 2010, from Dictionary.com website: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/merchant"

    Firearms "merchants", whether selling new or used guns, must be licensed by the federal government and are required to run background checks prior to each sale.

    The "gun show loophole" issue has nothing to do with "merchants" of firearms, but with private individuals who sell their own personal property to other private individuals NOT as a business or to garner an income. Incidentally, it also has nothing to do with gun shows as background checks for private sales are not required regardless of where they take place.

    People who are regularly selling guns (whether at a gun show or out of the trunk of their car) to make an income and are not federally licensed are already committing at least one felony.

    The issue is whether private citizens should be allowed to sell their personally owned property without getting permission from the government first...you know...sort of like free people get to do.

    Freedom is not a loophole.

    ReplyDelete
  2. ps: I apologize for misspelling your name.

    It's just force of habit to spell it that way.

    ReplyDelete